980 Target on the S&P 500

By iamned - Last updated: Wednesday, May 13, 2009

The following economic data is due this morning:

7:00 MBA Mortgage Applications
8:30 Retail Sales
8:30 Import/Export Prices
10:00 Business Inventories
10:30 EIA Petroleum Status

None of these will have a negative impact on stocks because it’s either not a big deal and or priced in. The only data point that could move the market is retail sales, but those would have to be absolutely god awful to see any substantial selloff. As written in more detail here retail sales aren’t a very reliable indicator of overall economic heath. All bad news will continue to be shrugged off as stocks scurry up a very high wall of worry.

The huge funds that move the market aren’t going to be selling anytime soon. They are loading up on Google, Apple, Rimm, Mastercard and other smartist, globalist stocks that benefit from a falling dollar and modest inflation.

The technicals are still very bullish. Stocks have been consolidating for the past two days on lighter volume, and are due for yet another break to the upside. The more these doom and gloomers try

gg

Filed in Uncategorized

Anti-Bailout Crybabies Make Me Go ROFL

By iamned - Last updated: Tuesday, May 12, 2009

The following econ events are due this morning:

7:45 ICSC Retail Store Sales
8:20 Fed’s Lockhart speaks at the Atlanta Fed’s Financial Markets Conference
8:30 International Trade
8:55 Redbook
2:00 PM Treasury Budget
5:00 PM ABC Consumer Confidence Index

None of these will have a negative impact on the stock market. Buy all dips.

A blogger who shall remain anonymous posted this rant a couple months ago when the DJIA reversed an intra-day 250 point loss on news of government intervention.

gg

It’s contradictory how these short sellers cry socialist whenever their positions goes against them due to bailout and stimulus initiatives, but extol the virtues of free market capitalism when they are successful. So it’s called capitalism when you money, but socialism when you lose money? LOL that makes perfect sense. No wonder these fools have such a large following and Prozac is a $10 billion/year drug…

But what about these banana republic crybabies? Here is a amusing rant by a seeking alpha author:

Was that an exaggeration? We will find out, but Obama has gone a lot further than any of his predecessors toward making America a banana republic. I spent part of the late 1980s and early 1990s globe-trotting with the notion that the Reagan economic revolution could be exported. My then business partner, the late Jude Wanniski, had coined the phrase ?supply-side economics? to characterize Robert Mundell?s economic recovery plan.

Banana or no banana I can’t complain. My Google, Mastercard, and Potash stock have been on a phenomenal rally for the past two moths thanks to the stimulus & bailout efforts of Geithner, Bernanke, and Obama. The economy is turning around, and the fact that I and others are making money hand over fist in this bull market can be attributed to capitalism. So I choose to make money instead of pounding the pavement over forces that are outside of my control.

CNBC and Fox Business news says there are no problems with te economy, as well as many analysts. Why can’t people understand that there is another perspective outside of the doom and gloom blogosphere echo chamber? Some people want the US economy and the stock market to do well. It’s good to present a balanced view so you can see both sides of an issue.

Filed in Uncategorized

Take the ISM Index With a Grain of Salt

By iamned - Last updated: Monday, May 11, 2009

Is the ISM manufacturing index a reliable economic indicator? Maybe not.

e

The ISM manufacturing index dipped periodically below 50 in 2003-2007 signaling contraction, but the stock market nearly doubled in that period. That’s because manufacturing isn’t important because the United States is no longer a manufacturing nation due to the thriving export based service and intellectual property sectors. Such companies that are prospering in this transitional phase include Apple, Google, Mastercard, Potash, WallMart, McDonalds; leaders of the last bull market.

In 2004 the ISM index plunged from 62 to 52, but the stock market still had a positive year and there was no recession. It dipped below 50 by the end of 2006, but the S&P 500 gained fifteen percent year over year, anyway. The economy, meanwhile, grew at a blistering pace thanks to exports, plunging personal savings rate, and robust consumer spending.

This is why welfare liberals and protectionist libertarians who rely on sociology and demographics for their investment decisions will loose money by shorting into bull markets. Or they will substantially underperform the market by sticking their money in some sort of dollar denominated ’safe haven’. They interpret the loss of manufacturing jobs as being indicative of economic weakness when, in fact, it isn’t.

Although the recent gains in the ISM index is evidence that the recession ended in March/April, it isn’t a reliable indicator for measuring overall economic health.

P.S.

Can we stop dwelling on job loss? On chat broads and blogs we keep hearing about unemployment such. Those jobs being lost aren’t important. The recession can end long before the jobs start coming back, and high employment results in inflation and stagnant technological progress, anyway.

Even if the government is lying and the real unemployment rate were 18% wouldn’t it already be reflected in the stock market? You think the huge funds that move the market rely on government released statistics? No, because they have their own proprietary data gathering models.

Filed in Uncategorized

Will Rising Food & Gas Prices Curb Demand?

By iamned - Last updated: Sunday, May 10, 2009

The answer is no, because food and gas are examples of inelastic goods; as the price rises demand is largely unchanged. That’s why no matter how much the boo hoo hoo liberals and Ron Paul knuckle draggers complain about ‘pain at the pump’ and rising food prices it has no effect on consumption. People will keep maxing out their credit cards on food and gas, even if gas retests four dollars a gallon within eighteen months (which it will). The graph below illustrates how miles driven (blue) dips only slighly as gas prices surge.

rrr

Unlike Germany or France the United States isn’t a nanny state thanks to welfare reform. People need to get to work, and have no choice but to spend $4 a gallon on gas, which explains its inelasticity. No gas = no commute = lose job = homeless. We need to learn to embrace rising gas and food prices instead of complaining.

For inquiring minds here’s some solutions solutions to your food and gas woes: Get a better paying job. Robert Kiyosaki says you can choose to be rich, which is great advice because being rich is better than being poor. Or use more credit card debt. Or consider shopping (and I know this may sound unappetizing) at PetCo for Gourmet Fancy Feast wet cat food. Cat food is high in protein and very cheap. If you want to be creative get tortillas and turn it into a cat chow taco. A case of 24 3-OZ cans of Fancy Feast costs only $15.

Filed in Uncategorized